It’s not just people who move freely within the EU. Infections have a field day too, imposing a stiff tax on borderless spaces.
It’s useful to remember that the two deadliest pandemics in European history occurred in the 14th century, when national borders were nonexistent, and in 1918-1920, when they had been crumbled by a world war.
The first happened too far in the past for any useful parallels to be drawn, but the second occurred only a century ago, allowing comparison. And it’s telling.
No centralised, coordinated response was possible to the Spanish flu: Europe was in disarray, yesterday’s enemies were becoming today’s friends and vice versa, rancour was in the air, along with mutual resentments and recriminations.
No pan-European institutions existed, although there were movements under way clamouring for their founding. As always in the wake of internecine carnages, people sought order and were desperate about not getting it.
It’s in bad taste even to mention coronavirus in the same breath as that pandemic. The scale is smaller by orders of magnitude, and the virulence is nowhere near as high.
Moreover, isn’t most of continental Europe now one family, united in its craving for a single federated state offering to exchange protection for allegiance? In fact, the state craved for is already there to all intents and purposes, and it’s wisely guiding Europe through the crisis.
Right. And if you believe this, I have a couple of bridges across the Danube and the Meuse for sale. For all its bluster and grandiose claims, the EU is amply proving yet again that the bubble of ideology bursts when touched by real life.
Ursula von der Leyen, the better-looking and more sober answer to Juncker, is screaming herself hoarse, urging unity: “The European Union can withstand this shock. But each member state needs to live up to its full responsibility and the EU as a whole needs to be determined, coordinated and united.”
Quite. And I’d like to be young, tall, rich and out on a crowded date with all of Weinstein’s victims.
For, push come to shove, all European countries are acting unilaterally. Every land for itself, and the devil take the hindmost – along with the beautiful idea of European unity.
In this context, some of the claims routinely claimed by and for the EU are shown for the humbug they are. We no longer need Nato and the American nuclear umbrella, say the federalists. If Russian tanks sweep across the plains, all European states as one will close ranks and… well you know the rest.
Yet a few thousand old people dying across Europe is enough for EU members to start acting in their own selfish interests. Ursula can flap her wings all she wants about the detrimental and useless effects of travel bans – she’s widely and predictably ignored.
The Danes, Poles, Czechs, Italians, Spanish, Belgians have already closed their borders or as near as damn. Panic is spreading all over Europe like brushfire, and the EU is helpless to do anything substantive or encouraging about it.
Many European states are on the brink of open revolt against that impotent and pernicious organisation. They managed to feign some lukewarm affection for it as long as money kept coming in and things were more or less on an even keel.
Yet the first sign of pressure and out goes affection. In comes defiance, resentment and particularism.
All this was entirely predictable. In fact, it was predicted by everybody who understands that ideological contrivances are at best useless and at worst catastrophic. Yet no one can outshout an ideology, and no one can make it listen.
As you watch EU flags disappear from Westminster, give thanks.
“We no longer need Nato and the American nuclear umbrella, say the federalists. If Russian tanks sweep across the plains, all European states as one will close ranks”
Presumably they will have then their own nuclear umbrella. The idea is to stop the Russians tanks “sweeping” in the first place.
Just imagine the German army with its mobility scooters and wooden Bren guns. In the words of the Duke of Wellington: “I don’t know what effect these men will have upon the enemy, but, by God, they frighten me”. The French do have a nuclear Force de frappe of 4 missile launching submarines and they do not need anyone else’s permission to use them. At present, the French system is hardly a deterrent by itself. It would be a big ask expect them to let their EU ‘friends’ borrow them or to get them to build some of their own. NATO has an extensive Trident fleet and Britain effectively hires a few missiles off the USA for its subs, but I suspect that they have to ask Uncle Sam’s permission to use them.
“Britain effectively hires a few missiles off the USA for its subs, but I suspect that they have to ask Uncle Sam’s permission to use them.”
Letter of Last Resort. Letter from the serving PM to the Captain of a Trident missile firing submarine. Instruction how to proceed if Channel 4 goes off the air and does not come back on.
Labour Party policy was to keep the sub builders in employment but fit the subs with dummy missiles that released messages of peace and friendship, essentially functioning as very expensive fortune cookies for the brain dead.
‘Britain effectively hires a few missiles off the USA for its subs, but I suspect that they have to ask Uncle Sam’s permission to use them.’
Correct. AWE Aldermaston manufactures, upgrades and maintains the Trident warheads – but the rocket vehicles themselves are manufactured, upgraded and maintained in the USA.
Crucially the encrypted guidance codes for said rocket vehicles are US controlled.
The USA could turn off our nuclear capability in an instant.
And now I hear that Germany has issued a blanket ban on the export of medical supplies to other EU countries.
You have to have a heart of stone…etc;
‘Sauve qui peut’ seems to be the guiding principle of the EU. And there I was, thinking it was one happy family.